¿Qué soluciones podemos crear para enfrentar la escasez de agua en un mundo cada vez más seco?: Aprender en un estudio bilingüe

May 17, 2026

Maestra Blanca teaches a 5th-grade dual-language Spanish class. In November 2025, six PASTEL teachers and some researchers joined teacher Blanca in her classroom for a Studio Day, a day of job-embedded professional development in which teachers, coaches, and researchers engage in multiple rounds of co-planning, co-teaching, and co-debriefing and real-time feedback. 

This tool highlights 1) How the team shifted a unit on water to a unit on water scarcity, with connections to family stories (including the teacher’s personal story), and how they challenged students to think critically about the role of industry as a part of water scarcity issues, and 2) How teachers attending Blanca’s studio decided to make shifts in their own teaching (see stories).

The central question of the unit was: ¿Qué soluciones podemos crear para enfrentar la escasez de agua en un mundo cada vez más seco? ¿A quién se debe considerar en estas soluciones? [How can we design for water shortages in an increasingly dry world? Who should be considered in these solutions?] The unit considered local and global trends in water shortages and helped the students consider possibilities for the future. As they designed solutions, they considered variation in weather, climate, geography, and human/multispecies needs. This work was part of the Promoting Asset-based Science Teaching for Emergent Language Learners (PASTEL) project, funded by the James S. McDonnell Foundation.

Teaching Considerations

Unit Overview

Summary of the first two lessons enacted in Maestra Blanca’s classroom

Lección 1: Introducing the phenomena & Eliciting ideas about trends in the data

The teacher shared data from recent reports and asked students to interpret graphs and ask questions in light of their family stories. They learned about the water cycle and underground water supplies. They created a list of relevant technical Spanish language with visuals at the front of the room. 

Students then created a model to explain why there are water shortages. They were encouraged to draw what they can and cannot see happening. These models revealed how students were making sense of the phenomenon and their speculations about what could happen in the future, along with their ideas about rights and responsibilities.

En el pasado

What was it like before the water shortages?

Ahora 

Why are water shortages happening?

En el futuro

What can we do to address the problem of water shortages?

Lección 1: Eliciting Local and Global Family Connections

The teacher began the unit by sharing her story of growing up in Mexico with only having access to water every 4th day. She did three rounds of elicitation.

  • Conexiones en casa 1 (local). Observa por 24 horas y describe de qué manera se usa el agua en casa. Usa palabras, dibujos con etiquetas, fotos.
  • Conexiones en casa 2 (local) Caminata por tu barrio/colonia. Sal a caminar con un adulto de casa por tu barrio/colonia y observa cómo se usa, dónde se almacena (storage), cómo se distribuye y adónde se va el agua. Usa palabras, dibujos con etiquetas, fotos.
  • Conexiones en casa 3 (global) Entrevista en casa. Pregunta a un adulto en casa si recuerda una historia acerca de la escasez de agua en tu comunidad, en alguna parte de EE.UU. o en otra parte del mundo (puede ser experiencia personal, un artículo que leyó, un video que vio). Piensa: ¿Por qué es importante el agua en esa comunidad? ¿Cómo se usa el agua en esa comunidad? ¿Qué debes tener en consideración? La historia la puede escribir el adulto o el estudiante. Usa palabras, dibujos con etiquetas, fotos.

In the classroom, they created posters on the wall representing what they learned individually and across students, considering connections among students.

 

 

Lección 2: Connecting Stories and Making Group Models 

When making group models, students began the lesson by revisiting models and deciding what they should add to a combined group model based on the evidence they learned thus far. Students looked at their individual models and read and highlighted similarities and differences between their models and the family stories on water usage at home and in communities. Blanca constantly referenced a wall in the front of her classroom with evidence (a set of graphs that describe the problem) and images of the phenomenon, and during the lesson, the students did the same. Students freely moved to these images and discussed what they meant and how they would add ideas to their group models. 

The class then read one family story about water rights in Sequim, Washington. This story was chosen because it highlighted local issues connected to salmon ecosystems and Indigenous groups. The students discussed the rights of people and water, then considered what they should add to their models, particularly around our responsibility to the planet. 

“El agua de irrigación viene del Río Dungeness. Mientras más personas se mudan a vivir a Sequin, el agua de irrigación escasea. La familia es parte de Sequim-Prairie Tri-Irrigation Association. En el 2000 la Asociación y las Tribus locales recibieron dinero para pagar la tubería de irrigación. Conservando más agua para los granjeros y los salmones en el río.  Los locales han usado hasta ahora los canales, pero con la nueva tubería los canales de agua no están permitidos. Los locales se quejan de la asociación; sus preocupaciones son que sacar agua de los canales matará el hábitat alrededor de los canales. Los canales filtran el agua a través de la tierra convirtiéndola en agua subterránea que llega a los pozos. Los pozos de las personas se secarán.”

Lección 2: Just-in-time instruction: Industries’ Impacts on Water Scarcity and Power Dynamics    

After the 1st lesson, teacher Blanca and the participating teachers/researchers noticed that students were attending to descriptions of environmental changes, but not root causes or the role of industry. Therefore, teachers Ruby and Michelle presented some just-in-time teaching to support students in asking questions about systems and power dynamics related to industry in water scarcity. Then, students used post-its to add information about the water cycle and industry to their models. 

student models considering the future of the planet and human responsibility

Equity

  • Positioning Culture, Families & Communities as Rightfully Belonging. The unit begins by having students learn from their surroundings and families, as they interview family members about their knowledge of water scarcity across the world, and take stock of how they use water in their homes. This pedagogical move intentionally incorporates parents and caregivers as knowledgeable. Maestra Blanca reported that parents appreciated seeing the map with their ideas in the classroom on back-to-school night. 
  • Building Classroom Cultures of Interdependence & Care. The introductory lessons ask students to consider connections among family stories, fostering a sense of shared experiences across cultural backgrounds. Placed at the beginning of the year, this helped students learn about interdependence and care for one another. 
  • Broadening Languages of Science & Literacy. Part of building a community of care is carefully reading one another’s family stories. The teacher supports language and literacy by giving students opportunities to read carefully, highlight similarities and differences, and then use what they learned to inform their models. This supported reading to connect. 
  • Fostering Interdependent Nature-Culture Relations. The unit supports students in considering the needs of nature and later the rights of nature, as they engage in world-building (Frausto Aceves & Morales-Doyle, 2022).
  • Recognizing that Power, Historicity & Futures Matter. Students reflect on possible futures for the planet and possible solutions, considering what they can do personally, as well as looking critically at the role of industry in driving water scarcity in Latin America.

Picture of cake and list of commitments

Stories

After co-teaching the first part of the lesson, we gathered to discuss what we noticed about how students engaged with the phenomenon and with one another.

Participating Teachers’ Learning

Host Maestra Blanca’s learning

 

Teachers participating in Blanca’s Studio Day considered how to shift their own instruction.

  • Teacher Moira’s Home Connections 

After attending Blanca’s studio, teacher Moira was inspired by the home connections Blanca’s lessons built on. So, she sent home letters to families asking for their personal connections to landforms and why it’s meaningful to them. Teacher Moira plans to use these home connections to do a mini-study later in the unit, and students can use those stories to add to their initial landform models. 

  • Teacher Iman’s Restructured Unit Planning, Deeper Learning, and Students as Scientists

Since attending Blanca’s studio, I have practiced focusing on a section of our unit more in-depth rather than trying to speed through several sections. I think this offers an opportunity for deeper learning and observing. I would like to continue incorporating opportunities for students to see themselves as scientists and to incorporate more family engagement. 

  • Teacher Nancy on Expanding Science Lessons and Showing the Scale of Impacts 

After attending Blanca’s studio, teacher Nancy kept thinking about how to help her students understand the scale of the central issue (e.g., the amount of water used up by data centers). During the studio, teacher Nancy noticed that when students were thinking about the dam (a water supply), only one student had seen a dam in person. It was thus difficult for students to picture just how big dams are. So, teacher Nancy is thinking about taking her science class outside (for her unit on salmon and dam removals in the PNW) next year, so students can compare a dam to the size of a building for scale.

  • Teacher Christina’s Adaptation of Just-in-time Mini Lessons on Environmental Impacts 

After seeing Blanca’s lesson on water pollution and how she added the mini lesson about how industry and technology affected a large part of it, I brought that knowledge into my classroom as well. When my classroom was learning about the geography of the world, the conversation of latitude/ longitude and the association with climate came up. In that specific lesson, I included a mini lesson about climate change and included the information about industry, consumerism, and technology impact that was shared in Blanca’s classroom. Especially since I teach in an area where many of the students’ parents work in the tech industry, it brought up great conversation and input. The students then chimed in with their own experiences with climate change and how they have been noticing big weather patterns throughout the past years

  • Teacher Christina’s Adaptation of Visual and Language Support for Key Concepts

When I was in Blanca’s classroom, I could clearly tell how useful the wall space posted with science concepts was for her students. The students I was working with were constantly referring back to the posters to look up the correct spelling and definition for their scientific explanations. This year, I have the largest number of emerging ML students, and adding visuals that support language has been very helpful to add. Also, using my bulletin board space and continuously updating it to match what I am teaching has been helpful. The curriculum I use does not include pictures with its vocabulary words. Therefore, even taking the extra time to add them myself has been helpful not just for my ML students but all of my students. It is also a resource I can continuously use next year as well.

Teacher Educators & Professional Learning

Studios are premised on the idea that teachers and researchers both seek to provide joyful, dignity-affirming learning for students (Scipio et al., 2025; Keifert et al., 2021; Espinoza et al., 2020). They are a form of job-embedded professional development that takes place during a school day. Before the studio, the Coach or School Team Leader facilitates a common planning meeting with teachers from the school; they design a unit of instruction and lessons for the studio day. On the day of the studio, teachers and others attending studio days (e.g., classroom teachers, coaches, researchers, administrators) engage in multiple rounds of co-planning, co-teaching, and co-debriefing and real-time feedback. To learn more about the studio process, please see our how-to page.

To support teachers in the broader network in learning from Blanca’s Studio Day, we created a video and a 2-page summary.

pdf image of summary of studio day learnings

 

Research

Related Posts

This site is primarily funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through Award #1907471 and #1315995