Building Reciprocity through Collaborative Storytelling

Oct 24, 2025

Teacher Janaki describes how teachers can engage their students in collaborative storytelling as a way to enact reciprocal teaching, rather than transactional. Teacher Janaki lays out a series of steps describing how each part of the process might be taken up in a transactional way, and how to shift it to a reciprocal lens. To give a practical idea of what this might look like, Janaki explains how she took up these changes towards reciprocal teaching through examples of a unit on planting trees with her 2nd-grade students.

This work was part of the Promoting Asset-based Science Teaching for Emergent Language Learners (PASTEL) project, funded by the James S. McDonnell Foundation.

Teaching Considerations

The steps laid out below are illustrated as an example from Teacher Janaki’s work. Our hope is to show a guide to how other teachers can shift from transactional to reciprocal ways of teaching science. Underpinning all of these steps is a genuine desire to build a classroom around care and interdependence – both for each other (within the classroom) and with the natural world outside of it. 

 

Step 1. Audit curriculum with a critical lens

 

The first official science unit of our school year was around plants and pollination. As I perused the district-given curriculum, I found a series of lessons guiding students through learning the names of plant parts and how pollination works. These lessons were fine, and for the most part, interesting and informative for children learning about new ideas to connect with what they may already know about plants in the world.

 

However, as a teacher, my view of science includes teaching in a way that not only shares information but pushes children to think critically about the world around them, using their own background knowledge, beliefs, and experiences to do so. The goal of this shift is to help students use science as a tool for building reciprocal relationships with each other, as well as with other humans, animals, plants, and non-living beings in their communities.

 

In order to do this, I did not necessarily need to throw out any of the lessons or standards that were given to me – but rather, consider the context in which students are learning these ideas, and to what end. This often leads to a shift in how science is taught, not necessarily what is taught (although sometimes, it’s both). I explain what that looked like in the context of this unit on plants and pollination, which can be seen in my Story.

 

Shifting towards reciprocity

The first question I found myself asking as I looked at the unit was, “Why do we care about this?” For some children (like myself with space or natural disasters), the answer might simply be, because this is a topic that catches their interest. But in other times, why students care might be related to issues they and their families are well-versed in, and might be tied to problems and solutions that are highly relevant for students. Identifying what these issues are and how they fit into learning objects is an important first step. 

 

It is important to remember how this step helps to move toward reciprocal relationships with students.

 

In your context:

When auditing and evaluating your curriculum materials through a critical lens, you can ask yourself the following questions.

 

  • What does this step mean?
  • How do you use this to push toward reciprocity?
  • What are your views of science that need to be critiqued, reckoned with, or uplifted?
  • How are you attending to care in both of nature/culture interdependence, but also care within the classroom?
  • How can you look beyond the expression of language in order to attend to expanding languages used within the classroom?

 

Step 2. Adapt curriculum for student interests

 

As the district-provided sequence of lessons came to a close, it still didn’t feel like the students were ready to be finished learning about plants. Our literacy curriculum included read-alouds about trees and plants, and students were begging for more, connecting the ideas they were hearing in literacy with the work we had done in science thus far.

 

The important thing to remember here as a teacher is that you are not the knowledge-bearer. We often find success in delivering instruction on topics we enjoy and know well, yet it can be very intimidating to attempt to teach about an idea you don’t feel like an expert in. It’s easy to get stuck on thoughts such as, “what if I don’t know the answer?” or “what if I teach something wrong?”

 

Shifting towards reciprocity:

At the heart of reciprocal teaching is the disruption of the norms that place the teacher as an expert, filling students’ minds with knowledge. Teachers and students are both able to take on the roles of learners and co-explorers. For this to happen, the teacher must be willing to explore ideas and topics in which they may not be able to provide all the answers. 

 

In your context:

As you consider curricular resources, standards, and central questions to guide your science units, you may also want to consider the opportunities students have to share their interests, explore their own questions, and discuss meaningful issues. One shift that can help to place students with more agency is to consider questions in which the answer is more open ended. While students explore the science topic of trees, and the required resources such as sunlight, water, and nutrients, you may also center questions such as:

  • How should we take care of the plants in our environment?
  • What is our responsibility for the living things around us?
  • How do plants live in relationship to other living creatures and humans?

 

Step 3: Broadening the scope of reciprocity

 

Part of the shift towards teaching science through a reciprocal lens includes considering explicitly where knowledge comes from, and why we learn about what we learn about. In the past step, we considered part of this by tailoring ideas to students’ interests. This step is included specifically to make space for broadening the considerations teachers make to identify the ways knowledge is a shared resource between students, teachers, families, communities, and society at large. 

 

Shifting towards reciprocity:

Consider ways that you might draw in knowledge from various sources, as well as opportunities for students to contribute back stories and knowledge to various groups:

  • Connect to family stories. This relational move may help to invite students’ families into the classroom space. 
  • Community or local phenomenon. What issues and events are happening in the communities in which your students live? Are there ways to position even young students as contributors to the community goals?
  • Reflect on the goals of standards and assessments. Whose knowledge is being prioritized by these systems? Whose knowledge could be added to the normal school discourse?

 

Step 4: Research/Sense-making

 

Students were eager to learn more about trees. Their interest was not limited to our 30 minutes of science time, nor to our literacy unit’s read-alouds. Kids found seeds at recess and brought them inside. They decorated the classroom with drawings of plant life cycles and chose books to read about trees we hadn’t explicitly talked about. 

 

Shifting towards reciprocity:

While teachers might feel pressure to run an efficient classroom, achieve each of the learning goals, and follow the scope and sequence to fidelity, a reciprocal classroom is not always so tidy. Space must be made to allow students to follow their interests, make suggestions for readings and learning work that was unplanned for. Autonomy and agency are explicitly tied to students’ sense-making. 

  • Consider opportunities for students to build knowledge.
  • Identify multiple entry points that allow students to use a diverse repertoire of learning approaches.
  • Consider the language needs of students and provide experiential learning that broadens language beyond expressive and receptive modes. 

 

Step 5: Storytelling

 

When the time came for the unit to close, I wanted to have a culminating project that would showcase both the content students had learned, but also experience the idea of interconnectedness. To achieve this goal, I designed an activity to support students in telling their own stories about trees, care, and interdependent relations. 

 

Shifting towards reciprocity:

Storytelling can be a powerful way for students to communicate their knowledge, experiences, and learning. Such opportunities can make space for students to explain the science ideas that are relevant to the learning, in this example, the biological process of growing trees. The stories can also feature the important characters in the students’ learning and how they relate, emphasizing the interconnectedness of students’ experiences, the trees’ experiences, and those of the community. Stories can also provide space for students to imagine a possible future in which their actions have an impact on the world around them. 

 

In this unit, I provided time for students to individually develop initial ideas for stories about trees of their choice. I then grouped students who were working on similar trees or similar themes and asked them to collaboratively construct a story that included multiple student perspectives and how they each supported the growth and development of the trees. 

 

Step 6: Reflection

Student reflection.

As a final step in this unit, I asked students to reflect on their learning and participation in this unit. This step, while helpful for me as a teacher to further assess student understanding, was primarily completed in order to help students build a sense of how their action guided the development of the lesson. My hope is that these students see themselves as active participants in their own education, as well as active participants in future learning opportunities that can serve communities. 

 

Teacher reflection

Equally important is the reflective process for educators. Individually or as a team of educators, you should reflect on the growth that both educators and students experienced as a part of the reciprocal learning and storytelling. Reflection can help solidify practices that were impactful, identify areas that need more attention in future units, and help better understand how the work of a class is in the community and in conversation with the work beyond the classroom. 

Equity

As a child, I loved science. I pored over books and magazines; I watched documentaries with rapt attention until I could explain in detail the subducting tectonic plates that cause an earthquake, the winds required to classify an EF5 tornado, and how the laws of physics might allow for wormholes that facilitate time travel. Entranced by imagination-bending facts, I grew up hoping to study them forever – meteorology, geology, astrophysics – I wanted to understand how the world works.

 

As a teacher, I was fortunate to have the conception I held of science and science learning questioned early on. Being steeped in the work of science educators who were approaching the subject in a much more active, collaborative, and student-centered way, I began to see science less as a series of facts to be learned, memorized, and dispersed to others, and more of an interwoven collection of experiences all beings have, make sense of, and utilize for their own lives. Students bring significant scientific knowledge and understanding with them to school – built on the stories and beliefs of their families and communities, and their own personal experiences and sense-making as a human experiencing the world. 

 

Science teaching at the elementary level (when it happens at all) is often taught in a very transactional way. To be more precise, teaching in general at the elementary level is often done transactionally. In transactional teaching, the teacher and the students have separate roles. Underpinning these roles is the information disseminated by a teacher, and a product to demonstrate understanding created by the student. Teaching & learning are designed to continue that loop, and progress across various content areas. The accuracy of the students’ products reflects the value of the teaching. These products of individual learning (be it a worksheet, a paper, or a project) are positioned as a commodity to be assessed. But then the question becomes, who can produce this product? Students become labeled as ‘disadvantaged’, or ‘struggling learners’, or even just ‘low kids’ when they cannot produce a product to the satisfaction of a standard. Terms like ‘ELL’ or ‘IEP’ become tossed around, and students are given support so that they can produce as well as the others – but at the core of this model, we are seeing all students as extensions of their production. 

 

An alternative, and deeply more humanizing approach to science teaching is considering reciprocity at the center. In contrast to transactional teaching, intellectual roles here are less clear – the teacher is not the knowledge-bearer, and the students are not empty sponges waiting to be saturated with information. This begins with believing that knowledge is acquired throughout one’s life through many means, particularly focusing on those not generally acknowledged at school – family knowledge, community knowledge, cultural knowledge, and knowledge gained from one’s own experiences. We also don’t define knowledge as objective truth – rather a set of beliefs about the world based on one’s own sense-making journey.

Stories

“Yesterday, we took a walk around the school to look at the trees around us, and we thought about where we could plant our trees so they will grow up healthy and get what they need. What do trees need again?”

“They need sunlight!”

“But not too much. They need shade, too.”

“They need water.”

“Or rain!”

“And soil to get nutrients!”

“I think the trees will want to be near other trees.”

”But they also need their own space for when they get big.”

”Birds need trees for their home. And squirrels.”

 

This classroom of second-grade students is deep into a unit on trees and their interdependence with humans and animals. While the unit was designed to explore plant structures and pollination, their teacher expanded the scope of learning when it became clear that students were fascinated by and drawn to trees and seeds. 

 

I wanted to give them opportunities to think more deeply about trees in their local ecosystem, and asked them to draw and write about trees that were important to their families. I also provided informational books, stories, and took the students on multiple “tree walks” throughout the school campus to give students a chance to understand and connect with the trees that surround them.

 

The school grounds, situated outside of Seattle in the Pacific Northwest, are littered with juvenile maple trees and surrounded on the border by tall evergreens. As students walked through, they compared leaves and seeds, looked for animals that made their homes in the school trees, and discovered other organisms that lived in tandem with the trees.

 

To give students a stake in the future of trees at their school, they were given the opportunity to plant vine maple tree seedlings (a tree native to the area) on the school grounds, as a way to care for and observe the life cycle of trees. In the days leading up to the planting, students walked around the school, looking for patterns of tree planting, types of trees, and ideal locations for new trees. 

 

Coming back to the classroom, students began discussing in earnest the best locations for the trees to be planted.

 

“It should be near the parent pickup area, where we measured the trees. We should plant them where there’s already a lot of trees, and there’s lots of trees there for them to be next to.”

“It’s too loud there with all the cars. We should plant them in the field so they can have space and a lot of sun and rain.”

“We should plant the trees where we can see them so we can visit them during recess.”

As shown by this conversation, students considered different things when thinking about where to plant the trees. Some focused on what the trees need on a scientific basis – such as water, sun, and nutrients. Others thought of what a tree might want in an emotional sense – like proximity to other trees. Others considered what trees brought to us – for example, one student said that the trees should be planted in the recess area because it would be pretty.

 

Through grappling with the question of where to plant the trees, students are demonstrating an understanding of reciprocal relationships between humans and trees – understanding and advocating for the needs of the trees, and how we can support their growth – as well as thinking about what the trees will bring to us.

_________________________________________

 

When tree-planting day came, the class strode through the school grounds, winding through hallways and over concrete, behind the row of portables, and up the slight slope to the field of grass near the back of the school. A small strip of land had been designated by the principal and maintenance workers as a spot suitable for the trees. Each student had been given a job – to shovel the dirt out, to pat the dirt back in, or to water the tree once it was planted.

A group of students huddles around the recently-dug fresh earth, excited for what is to come. Taking turns, they pour a small bit of dirt over the roots of a vine maple seedling, pat the earth with their hands, and carefully saturate the young tree with water. The tree’s leaves are turning fiery shades of red and orange, matching those of the older trees that surround it. 

 

In the months to come, students would ask to visit their trees. Twice a week, after music class in the nearby portable, the class peeked at them. The fiery leaves turned brown and tumbled off. In winter, when they looked like nothing more than sticks, they were concerned – were the trees okay? Would they make it to spring? Finally – a green leaf! The excitement was palpable.

 

At the end of the school year, on Field Day, the whole school was gathered behind the portables where the trees had been planted. One tree was now lush, green, and filled with leaves – it had survived the winter frost. However, its companion fared less well. Looking sickly, tipping slightly, with a single drying leaf.

 

As students from all classes filed into the area behind the portables, there was a chorus of, “Those are our trees! We planted them!” They excitedly showed kids from the other classes.

 

“I’m feeling sad that one of our trees is sick and might die, but I’m feeling happy that the other one is alive and healthy.”

Research

Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.

Hatt, B. E. (2005). Pedagogical love in the transactional curriculum. Journal of curriculum studies, 37(6), 671-688.

Popham, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing: An educator’s call to action. ASCD.

Related Posts

This site is primarily funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through Award #1907471 and #1315995